Lexical encapsulation and evaluation in parliamentary debate

Josep E. Ribera; Maria Josep Marín

doi:10.14198/ELUA2018.32.13

Autores/as

Josep E. Ribera Universitat de València, España https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-8150
Maria Josep Marín Universitat de València, España https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-9933

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2018.32.13

Palabras clave:

encapsulation, lexical cohesion, objectivation, subjectivation, parliamentary debate

Resumen

Lexical encapsulation consists of a series of abstract unspecific nouns (fact, plan...) referring to predicative antecedents. This study is based on a corpus of parliamentary debate in English, Catalan and Spanish (PD) and deals with encapsulation as a complex lexical cohesion device which allows the addressor to evaluate the information of the debates in various ways. Our work tries to highlight the role of lexical encapsulation to reflect the addressor’s positioning with respect to the topic discussed, and to establish whether there are outstanding cross-linguistic differences. In order to delimit the diverse evaluative strategies, an approach from the perspective of prototype theory is adopted, since there are fuzzy boundaries among the different evaluative operations observed. Firstly, the distinction between implicit and explicit evaluation is established. As for explicit evaluation, two different operations are described: objectivizing and subjectivizing encapsulation. The objectivizing one works as a subtle strategy of persuasion addressed mostly to the opponents, whereas the subjectivizing encapsulating structures point to rally the unconditional allies. The results show similar trends in the three languages due to the homogenizing potential of PD as a distinct genre of political discourse.

Financiación

This research is part of the project Grampint (Grammar, Pragmatics and Multimodal Interaction, reference FFI2014-56258-P), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

Citas

Borreguero Zuloaga, M. (2006). “Naturaleza y función de los encapsuladores en los textos informativamente densos (la noticia periodística)”, Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 13, pp. 73-95.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987 [1978]). Politeness: Some Universals in Laguage Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Cuenca, M. J. (2000). “Estudi estilístic i contrastiu de l’arquitectura de l’oració: estil segmentat vs. estil cohesionat”, Caplletra, 29, pp. 105-120.

Cuenca, M. J. (2014). “The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate”, Discourse Studies, 16, pp. 729-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614546258

Cuenca, M. J., & Marín, M. J. (2015). “La representación discursiva del adversario en el debate electoral”, Oralia, 18, pp. 45-79.

Díez Prados, M., & Cabrejas Peñuelas, A. B. (2012). “Cohesion in American political rhetoric: The Gettysburg Address, I have a dream and Obama’s Inaugural Address”, Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 20, pp. 37-60. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_EIUC.2012.v20.39994

Flowerdew, J., & Forest, R.W. (2015). Signalling Nouns in English: A Corpus-Based Discourse Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135405

Fuentes Rodríguez, C. (2010). “La aserción parlamentaria: de la modalidad al metadiscurso”, Oralia, 13, pp. 97-125.

Geeraerts, D. (2006). Prospects and problems in prototype theory. In D. Geeraerts (ed.) Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 141–166 [1989].

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnolds.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English, London: Logman.

Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse: Status and Value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & Thompson G. (eds.). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 176-207.

Hunston, S. (2008). “The evaluation of status in multi-modal texts”, Functions of Language, 15/1, pp. 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15.1.05hun

Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) (2000). Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ilie, C. (2006). Parliamentary discourses. In K. Brown (ed.). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 9, 2ª ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00720-3

Izquierdo Alegría, D., & González Ruiz, R. (2013a). “Encapsulación y etiquetas discursivas en el discurso parlamentario: función argumentativa a partir de un corpus paralelo”, Oralia, 16, pp. 185-219.

Izquierdo Alegría, D., & González Ruiz, R.. (2013b). “La evaluación a través de un mecanismo cohesivo: las etiquetas discursivas en un corpus de editoriales”. In C. Llamas Saíz, C. Martínez Pasamar & M. Casado Velarde (eds.). Léxico y argumentación en el discurso público actual. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp.149-185.

Jansen, H. (2003). Densità informativa. Tre parametri linguistico-testuali. Uno studio contrastivo inter- ed intralinguistico. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

López Samaniego, A. (2014). Las etiquetas discursivas: cohesión anafórica y categorización de entidades del discurso. Pamplona: EUNSA.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620614

Marín, M. J. & Ribera, J. E (2018). “Estructures encapsuladors amb valor metadiscursiu en el debat parlamentari: De l’estructuració a la modalitat”, Caplletra, 64. In Marín, M. J. & Ribera, J. E. coords, pp. 227-252.

Marín, M. J. & Ribera, J. E. (coords) (2018). L’encapsulació lèxica: cohesió, coherència i metadiscurs, Caplletra, 64, pp. 105-252. https://doi.org/10.7203/caplletra.64.11366

Mur Dueñas, P. (2003-2004). “Analysing Stance in American and Spanish Business Management RAs: The Case of Sentence-Initial ‘Retrospective Labels’”, Journal of English Studies, 4, pp. 137-154.

Ribera, J. E. (2007). “Text Deixis in Narrative Sequences”, International Journal of English Studies, 7/1. pp. 149-168.

Ribera, J. E. (2012). La cohesió lèxica en seqüències narratives. Alacant/Barcelona: Institut Interuniversitari de Filologia Valenciana/Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.

Ribera, J. E. (2016). “Encapsulació i estructura informativa en el debat parlamentari. Una anàlisi contrastiva (català-espanyol-anglès)”, Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 43/2, pp. 29-50. https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2016.432.002

Schmid, H. - J. (2000). English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704

Schmid, H. - J. (2018). “Shell nouns in English – a personal roundup”, Caplletra, 64. In Marín, M. J. & Ribera, J. E. coords., pp. 109-128. https://doi.org/10.7203/caplletra.64.11368

Sentí, A. (2017). Modalitat i evidencialitat en català antic. Un acostament cognitiu a les perífrasis verbals amb deure i amb haver. València/Barcelona: Institut Interuniversitari de Filologia Valenciana/Publicacions de l’Abadia de Montserrat.

Serafini, M. (1992). Come si scrive. Milano: Fabbri-Bompiani.

Thompson, G., & Zhou, J. (2000). “Evaluation and Organization in Text: The Structuring Role of Evaluative Disjuncts”. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.), pp. 121-141.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). “Parliamentary Discourse”. In R. Wodak & T. A. Van Dijk (eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava, pp. 45-78.

Yamasaki, N. (2008). “Collocations and colligations associated with discourse functions of unspecific anaphoric nouns”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13/1, pp. 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.1.05yam