Análisis comparativo temporal de los procesos de reconocimiento de usos neológicos formales y semánticos
Resumen
Palabras clave
Referencias
Arzouan, Y. et alii (2007). “Dynamics of hemisphere activity during metaphor comprehension: Electrophisiological measures”, NeuroImage, 36, pp. 222-251.
Auger, P. & L. J. Rousseau (2003): Metodología de la investigación terminológica. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga.
Bastuji, J. (1974). “Aspects de la néologie sémantique”, La néologie lexicale. Langages, 36, pp. 6-19.
Benedek, M. et alii (2014). “Creating metaphors: The neural basis of figurative language production”, NeuroImage, 90, pp. 99-106.
Bennett, M. R. & P. M. S. Hacker (2006). “Language and cortical function: Conceptual developments”, Progress in Neurobiology, 80, pp. 20-52.
Brown, K. (ed.) (2006, 2 nd ed.). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam / London: Elservier.
Burani, C., Arduino, L. S. & S. Marcolini (2006). “Naming Morphologically Complex Pseudowords: A headstart for the root?”, The Mental Lexicon: a Journal of cross-disciplinary research,1, pp. 299-327.
Burani, C. & A. Caramazza (1987). “Representation and processing of derived words”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, pp. 217-227.
Burani, C., Dovetto, F. M., Spuntarelli, A., & A. M. Thornton (1999). “Morpholexical access and naming: The semantic interpretability of new root-suffix combinations”, Brain and Language, 68, pp. 333-339.
Butterworth, B. (1983). “Lexical representation”. En Butterworth, B. (ed.). Language production, Vol. 2. London: Academic Press, pp. 257-294.
Butterworth, B. (1989). “Lexical access in speech production”. En Marslen-Wilson, W. (ed.). Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 108-135.
Casasanto, D. & G. Lupyan (2015). “All concepts are ad hoc”. En Margolis, E. & S. Laurence (eds.). The Conceptual Mind: New directions in the Study of Concepts. Cambrigde MA: MIT Press, pp. 543-566.
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Chiarcos, C., Barry, C. & M. Grabski (eds) (2011). Salience: Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse. New York / Berlin: de Gruyter.
Colé, P., Beauvillain, C. & J. Segui (1989). “On the Representation and Processing of Prefixed and Suffixed Derived Words. A Differential Frequency Effect”, Journal of Memory and Language, 28, pp. 1-13.
Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dell, G. & P. O’ Seaghdha (1992). “Stages of lexical access in language production”, Cognition, 42, pp. 287-314.
Díaz Hormigo, Ma T. & C. Varo Varo (2012). “Neology and Cognition”. Linguistics Insights. Vol. 158. Eizaga Rebollar, B. (ed.). Studies in Linguistics and Cognition. Bern: Peter Lang, pp.15-34.
Falk, S. (2014). “On the notion of salience in spoken discourse – prominence cues shapping discourse structure and comprehension”, Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et la langage, 30, pp. 1-23.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
Geiger, O. (1999). “Metaphors and the Mental Lexicon”, Brain and Language, 68, pp. 190-198.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gildea, P. & S. Glucksberg (1983). “On Understanding Metaphor. The Role of Context”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp. 577-590.
Givòn, T. (ed) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S. (2003). “The psycholinguistics of metaphor”, Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, pp. 92-96.
Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P. & H. A. Bookin (1982). “On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, pp. 85-98.
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & R. Zacharski (1993). “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse”, Language, 69, pp. 274-307.
Janus, R. A., & T. G. Bever (1985). “Processing of metaphoric language: An investigation of the three-stage model of metaphor comprehension”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, pp. 473–487.
Kiefer, M. & F. Pulvermüller (2012). “Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions”, Cortex, 48, pp. 805-25.
Lai, V., Curran, T. & L. Menn (2009). “Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study”, Brain Research, 1284, pp. 145-155.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamb, S. (1999). Pathways of the brain. The neurocognitive basis of language. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. I. Standford: Standford University Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W. et alii (1994). “Morphology and meaning in the mental lexicon”, Psychological Review, 101,1, pp. 3-33.
Mashal, N. et alii (2007). “An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions”, Brain and language, 100, pp. 115-126.
Meunier, F. & C-M. Longtin (2007). “Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing”, Journal of Memory and Language, 56, pp. 457-471.
Ortony, A. et alii (1978). “Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17, pp. 465-477.
Pottier Navarro, H. (1979). “La néologie en espagnol contemporain”, Les langues néolatines, 229-230, pp. 148-172.
Pulvermüller, F. (2001). “Brain reflections of words and their meanings”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 12, pp. 217-24.
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). The neuroscience of language. Reimpr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pulvermüller, F. (2012). “Meaning and the brain: the neurosemantics of referential, interactive, and combinatorial knowledge”, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, pp. 423-59.
Pulvermüller, F. (2013). “How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 9, pp. 458-70.
Pynte, J. et alii (1996). “The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study”, Brain and Language, 55, pp. 293-316.
Rapp, A. M., Mutschler, D. E. & M. Erb (2012). “Where in the brain is nonliteral language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies”, NeuroImage, 63, pp. 600-610.
Silvia, P. J. & R. E. Beaty (2012). “Making creative metaphors: the importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought”, Intelligence, 40, pp. 343–351.
Taft, M. & K. Forster (1975). “Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, pp. 638-647.
Varo Varo, C, Díaz Hormigo, Ma T. & Ma J. Paredes Duarte (2009): “Modelos comunicativos y producción e interpretación neológicas”, Revista de Investigación Lingüística, 12, pp. 185-216.
Yang, J. (2012). “The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a metaanalysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies”, Human Brain Mapping, 35, 1, pp. 107-122.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2019.33.10
Copyright (c) 2019 Carmen Varo Varo

Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.